Linking Diversity and Civic-Minded Practices with Student Outcomes

Posted by John H. Pryor on May 8th, 2012 in News, News Homepage, Surveys | No Comments »

HERI Director Sylvia Hurtado and CIRP Assistant Director for Research Linda DeAngelo have a new article in AAC&U’s “Liberal Education” journal that presents national evidence of the positive impact of diversity and civic-related practices from the CIRP student surveys and the HERI Faculty Survey.

This fantastic article provides evidence of the impact of college programs and student experiences on academic, diversity, and civic outcomes taken from a series of research projects at HERI. Along the way it demonstrates the ability of CIRP surveys to be powerful tools to assess progress along multiple areas that matter to colleges and uiniversities.

The authors use the CIRP Surveys to show the link between campus climate, institutional practices, and student outcomes. They demonstrate that different initiatives on campus, such as community service in class and experiences with faculty on research, lead to desirable gains in both academic and diversity-related outcomes. Co-curricular experiences in college, such as interactions with diverse peers, also impact gains in these areas. Hurtado and DeAngelo close by telling us “The nature of the climate, opportunities for learning about diversity, and civic-minded practices among faculty and staff are key features of inclusive learning environments that result in developing informed and engaged citizens.”

In Defense of Using Surveys in Assessment

Posted by Laura Palucki Blake on April 25th, 2012 in News, News Homepage, Surveys | No Comments »

This piece originally appeared in the April Newsletter for the New Leadership Alliance for Student Learning and Accountability. It’s a wonderful organization and resource for those of us committed to the assessment of student learning, and worth checking out.

I’ve just returned from several assessment and accreditation conferences, and at each and every one, speakers cast a questioning eye towards the use of survey data in assessment. I’ve always been of the mind that understanding student learning is a complex endeavor, and there was no simple “killer” assessment method which would establish what students know and can do. As a former Director of Assessment, I’ve used rubrics, set up and evaluated portfolios to look at general education skills, helped departments administer standardized tests to measure content knowledge, and yes, used surveys to document and understand student learning.
Every assessment method has its advantages and disadvantages, and each can be used and misused, but I’d like to make the case that survey results are a natural and necessary companion to other measures of student learning.
Why? Assessing student learning is complicated and can be resource intensive. It takes time to develop rubrics, and campuses with portfolios can attest that they can be a challenge to maintain and score. Before embarking on direct assessments like rubrics and portfolios—both methods that can yield powerful insights into student learning—it is useful to take a careful look at the survey results to see what is already known about the learning outcome to avoid spending time and resources addressing issues for which information is already available. For example, an institution might be interested in the development of writing skills. Looking at survey results about how often students are asked to write papers of varying length or which majors or divisions are assigning various types of writing, can help an institution make decisions about where to target their direct assessment and understand the types of work that are likely to be received. Survey results can also be used to focus the content of the direct assessment itself. If survey results suggest that most students are frequently being asked to support their opinion with a logical argument, then assessments can be designed to examine that in greater detail. By providing information about what students are already doing and where, results from surveys can help an institution keep its assessment efforts manageable, strategic, and focused on improvement.
Many schools examine learning outcomes, like critical thinking or mathematical ability, using a standardized measure or test. This tells you important information about student performance, but does not provide the whole picture. If 25% of students score below a threshold on a standardized math test for example, what should the course of action be? How can that score be improved? Linking the test score with survey results allows you to look at other environmental factors: how often do these students study; do they study in groups; whether or not they took any remedial or special programs; how often they interacted with faculty. The more we know about the students behaviors in college, the more we can design activities and programs that foster the desired outcome.
Surveys get at issues that matter-not only cognitive aspects of student performance, but also non-cognitive aspects, like student values, responsibilities and commitments to citizenship, and community service. Taken together, these allow an institution to get a sense of civic engagement of its students. By collecting this information, surveys give institutions a window into the gestalt of the college experience, and allow institutions to connect gains in student learning to academic experiences like participation in first-year seminars, frequent interaction with faculty members outside of class, and with other important aspects of the college experience such as service learning and leadership training. Because surveys often ask about a wide variety of experiences, behaviors and beliefs, institutions can make connections between seemingly disparate aspects of the college experience. That information can be used to better understand how students use and experience the college, and to target improvement efforts.
Survey results can be disaggregated easily to look at relevant subgroups. For many faculty and staff “Are we meeting our goals?” is a pretty simplistic question. What they really want to know is far more subtle—for whom is the campus successful; what is being learned; are students here thriving, and which ones? All of these questions speak to how well a school is fulfilling its educational mission. Surveys allow us to get an understanding of how different groups of students are experiencing the educational environment.
The ultimate goal in assessment is to inform institutional change, to actually make changes that impact what students get out of college. We do this by aligning the programs, practices and opportunities on campus to foster a better learning environment. There are many ways of gathering assessment evidence, and survey results are an essential piece in the puzzle that should not be downplayed or overlooked.

HERI Presentations at AERA

Posted by Linda DeAngelo on April 9th, 2012 in Conferences, News Homepage, Research, Surveys | No Comments »

AERA (April 13 to 17) time is here again.  We will have 17 presentations this year at the conference that use CIRP data or are HERI sponsored studies.  Of these presentations, half are studies that are HERI sponsored and half are from researchers granted access to CIRP data through our data access proposal process.  Topic wise, 5 of the presentations are on issues of diversity, 4 on STEM issues, 2 on retention, and 1 each on degree aspirations, methods, student athletes, veteran students, civic engagement, and faculty.  In addition, HERI Director Dr. Sylvia Hurtado is also scheduled to speak in a special Presidential Session.

Highlights among these sessions is a symposium on STEM this Friday in which the HERI BEST Research Team will present 3 papers, 1 on science identity, 1 on graduate students, and 1 on introductory STEM courses.

Friday: 2:15 PM – 3:45 PM, Pan Pacific – Restaurant Level, Oceanview 7/8

A second highlight is a session on Saturday in which Dr. Huratdo will discuss mixed methods research and her reflections as a mixed methods researcher.

Saturday: 10:35 AM – 12:05 PM, Marriott Pinnacle, Shaughnessy I

And, a third highlight is a second presentation by Dr. Hurtado on the last day of the conference on stereotype threat.

Tuesday: 2:15 PM – 3:45 PM, Vancouver Convention Centre, East Ballroom A

For a full listing of the presentations at the conference click here.

A Pinteresting Opportunity for Higher Ed

Posted by Alana Klein Prisco on February 29th, 2012 in News Homepage | Comments Off

 

I had been hearing a lot about Pinterest over the last year (mostly from friends and colleagues whom I’d describe as creative, visually-minded, even artsy), and was admittedly skeptical about the versatility of this new social media tool. Allowing users to share images, videos and links through the use of a virtual bulletin board or “pinboard,” Pinterest seemed just like the latest fad in social media designed for a niche audience.

My curiosity ultimately got the best of me and I joined it anyway.  That’s when I realized its distinct value—to help organize all of the things I like and that interest me in one place and to then have the ability to share these things with others.

I got to thinking about how Pinterest could be used in a professional space thanks to USA Today’s recent article about the role of Pinterest in higher ed and other coverage of the topic, including this article from Higher Ed Live.

Now that Pinterest has become more mainstream, I am starting to think that not having a presence on this site could result in a missed opportunity from both a marketing and branding standpoint.

After all, the Pinterest audience is growing exponentially with ten million unique visitors each month. And, of the top seven social media sites, Pinterest is tied for second place in capturing visitors for the longest period of time in a given month (see the image above or  infographic here).

I see many ways in which HERI could utilize Pinterest–to share our news, reports, infographics and other valuable materials. Only time will tell whether Pinterest will take off in the higher ed community. My bet is that it will.

 

 

 

Moving from Having Results to Using Results

Posted by Laura Palucki Blake on February 24th, 2012 in News, News Homepage, Surveys, Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

I’ve just returned from co-leading a workshop for the Higher Education Data Sharing Consortium (HEDS) with Jillian Kinzie. Ten schools had put together teams composed of an institutional researcher, a faculty member or faculty development person and someone from academic leadership. The goal of the workshop was for the teams to review, discuss and identify one or two important patterns in their schools’ CIRP and NSSE results that they wanted to explore, and to develop a specific plan for faculty/staff development activities—based on the survey evidence—that they would implement over the coming year.

As anyone who knows me can attest, as I started to prepare for the workshop-which would involve two plenary sessions-I experienced that telltale moment of panic. What had I gotten myself into? I’ve used assessment evidence to bring changes about at several colleges; I talk with schools about how they use their CIRP results almost daily, so I should be fine, right?

My anxiety about speaking about using CIRP results is at the heart of what Charlie Blaich as the director of HEDS is committed to changing—a belief that posting good data on an IR website is not enough to stimulate campuses to use the data to improve student learning.

This is exactly why Jillian and I came together, particularly because we are discussing the use of survey results. After the results from surveys arrive on campus, the results need to be publicized, pushed out to faculty, staff and students using terminology that does not require an advanced degree in statistics to understand. The second part of this process—the part where we have conversations about the results, reflect on their meaning, and take action on campus–is not always given the respect (and time) it deserves.

If we want results from surveys to be used to improve the learning environment, then we need to describe the results in clear terms and indicate why they are of interest to the campus. We should work with faculty and staff to think about additional analyses and other sources of evidence that might be relevant to contextualize, elaborate, or refine our understanding of the issue. We should consider how to involve students in the process of making sense and responding to survey results. We should endeavor to keep the conversations and the dialog going over time, and to find two or three actions we can take based on what we are learning.

Good institutional research and assessment is not simply about having the most graphs or a really complex multivariate analysis. Rather it’s about being able to communicate patterns you see in results clearly and in a way that underscores why they are important on campus; to engage different constituencies in conversations about the results; and to allow them the opportunity to connect their work to the findings. The ultimate goal here is aligning the programs, practices and opportunities on campus to foster a better learning environment.